Expected value is a useful tool for comparing decision options under uncertainty, but it has some limitations that you should be aware of. First, expected value does not account for the variability or risk of the outcomes. For example, option C and option D have the same expected value, but option C has a higher standard deviation, which means it is more volatile and risky. Some people may prefer a lower expected value with less risk, while others may prefer a higher expected value with more risk. Second, expected value does not account for the utility or preference of the decision-maker. For example, suppose you have to choose between two options: E and F. Option E gives you a 100% chance of winning $100. Option F gives you a 50% chance of winning $200 and a 50% chance of winning nothing. Both options have the same expected value of $100, but option E is more certain and option F is more exciting. Some people may prefer option E because they value certainty, while others may prefer option F because they enjoy gambling. Third, expected value relies on the accuracy and availability of the probabilities and values of the outcomes. Sometimes, these may be difficult to estimate or obtain, or they may change over time. For example, suppose you have to choose between two options: G and H. Option G gives you a 90% chance of winning $100 and a 10% chance of losing $1,000. Option H gives you a 10% chance of winning $1,000 and a 90% chance of losing $100. The expected value of option G is (0.9 x 100) - (0.1 x 1,000) = -10. The expected value of option H is (0.1 x 1,000) - (0.9 x 100) = -10. Both options have the same expected value, but option G is more risky and option H is more conservative. However, suppose that the probabilities of option G change over time, and become 80% and 20% respectively. Then, the expected value of option G becomes (0.8 x 100) - (0.2 x 1,000) = -120, which is lower than option H.