How can you balance positive and negative feedback in academic writing?

Feedback can be both objective and subjective, it can also be biased and unbiased. The target of the feedback, that is you - the writer, can also be both objective or subjective and biased or unbiased. When reviewing the feedback, try to detach yourself from the inner feeling that you are the target, and view it as a neutral judge. This way, the feedback will be very evident. You will be able to see if the feedback was objective or not, a personal attack in disguise or a genuine and sincere attempt, was it just a way of appease you so that you stop bothering. Some feedback are by the facilitators who want to to make students go away, while others don't even look at the matter and point out the format issues. Look carefully to decode.

Opinions are predominantly personal in nature. Instead of feeling dejected, one should aspire to learn from the feedback. There are always 2 sides of a coin and one should even view one's own writings objectively. No one is perfect. I have expanded my horizon tremendously after getting critical feedbacks on my articles.

Think of feedback like a map showing you the way – it's there to help, not to criticize. The goal is to understand why you're getting feedback in the first place. It's not just about pointing out mistakes; it's about guiding you toward improvement.

It is a basic human nature that emotions trigger first and practical aspects later. One should try to focus on the substantial part of the feedback which might be hindering our performance and work to reform the same, instead of taking it to the heart. Similarly, in case of positive feedback - one should remember the technique and try to follow it in subsequent events.

Feedback is crucial for improvement and growth. Whether receiving positive or negative feedback, it's important to appreciate it, learn from it, and move forward. The purpose of feedback isn't to criticize but to aid our development. We should express gratitude to those giving feedback and encourage them to continue providing insights in the future.

The sources from which we receive feedback are crucial. Feedback from experts in the field should be acknowledged and understood to identify our shortcomings. Feedback received from experts is also of high quality. If the feedback comes from someone who isn't an expert, it can be seen as more general. Before acting on general feedback, it's essential to assess its relevance to our field.

When checking out feedback, think of it like examining a tool before using it – consider where it's coming from and how good it is. Look at who's giving the feedback. If it's someone experienced or knowledgeable in the subject, their insights might be more valuable.

It's important to approach comments with an open mind and a critical eye. Having an open mind promotes positive environments by enabling you to examine viewpoints that differ from your own .

When you get feedback, think of it like trying on new clothes – be open to the suggestions, but also check if they really fit. Keep an open mind and try to see things from the feedback giver's perspective.

Think of feedback as puzzle pieces that can make your work even better – when you get them, don't just admire them, put them into the puzzle! Once you've received feedback, take the time to carefully review it.

Think of feedback in academic writing like a balanced diet – you need a mix of the good stuff and some areas to work on. When you get feedback, there's usually both positive and negative aspects highlighted.