Before choosing arbitration as a conflict resolution method, it is important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of this option. Arbitration can save time and money by avoiding lengthy and costly court proceedings, and it can also preserve the relationship between the parties by avoiding adversarial and public litigation. Additionally, it offers more flexibility and control over the process and the outcome by allowing the parties to choose the arbitrator, the rules, and the criteria for the decision. The arbitrator also has specialized knowledge and experience in the relevant field, as well as impartiality and independence. However, arbitration can limit the rights and remedies of the parties by waiving their access to the court system and appeal or review processes. Furthermore, it reduces transparency and accountability of decisions by keeping them confidential and not subject to legal scrutiny or standards. It may also create power imbalances and unfairness if one party has more resources, influence, or familiarity with the arbitrator or process. Finally, it may generate dissatisfaction since it imposes a decision that may not reflect the interests, needs, or preferences of the parties.