Here's how you can improve workplace communication through logical reasoning.

Como dice el dicho lo correcto es: La fuerza del argumento y no el argumento de la fuerza. Si necesitamos comunicar algo complejo, hemos de partir por la idea madre para poder explicar luego cada punto; lo importante es no pasar a otro punto sin que se haya entendido correctamente el anterior. Si logramos -con la práctica- estructurar nuestras comunicaciones desde lo más simple hasta lo más complejo puede que esto se convierta en un hábito positivo que nos ayude a comunicarnos mejor con nuestro equipo, nuestra familia y con todo aquel que se relaciones formal e informalmente con nosotros.

El exceso de informacion hoy en dia, abruma. Es necesario que al expresarnos utilicemos argumentos que esten sustentados no en la informacion, si no en el conocimiento comprobado. En lugar de dejar llevarno por tendencias, utilicemos el razonamiento logico para guiarnos a tener conversaciones ascertivas

One of the most powerful qualities of human beings that creates the differentiator is the way we think and reason. We often tend to see things in a particular way, because that's how we have been trained based on our own experiences and those of others. So if you want people to listen to you, you need to start thinking in as many ways as the number of people you meet. Sounds rough right? So why not as start with basic? Use logical reasoning to convert those complex multiple systems into one simple language that each one understands. This is where you start engaging, rather than just speaking. Once they start getting engaged, it's a discussion and that's the best form of communication.

Einfach gesagt ist logisches Denken ist wie ein stabiler Rahmen für klare Kommunikation. Es hilft, Gedanken in eine geordnete Struktur zu bringen und sicherzustellen, dass Argumente logisch aufeinander aufbauen. Wenn Sie logisches Denken anwenden, vermeiden Sie Missverst?ndnisse. Beginnen Sie mit dem Hauptpunkt und fügen Sie dann strukturierte Beweise hinzu. So k?nnen Ihre Kollegen besser folgen und konstruktiv mit Ihnen diskutieren.

A comunica??o eficaz é fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer organiza??o. No entanto, muitas vezes, a falta de clareza e a presen?a de falácias podem comprometer a transmiss?o de informa??es importantes. O raciocínio lógico surge como uma ferramenta poderosa para melhorar a comunica??o no local de trabalho, garantindo que as mensagens sejam claras, precisas e persuasivas. 1. Entenda a lógica Compreender os princípios básicos da lógica é essencial para estruturar argumentos de forma coerente. A lógica ajuda a evitar contradi??es e a construir um discurso que flui de maneira natural. Conhecer as formas de raciocínio, como a dedu??o e a indu??o, permite que os comunicadores apresentem suas ideias de maneira mais convincente e fundamentada.

Once you engage people in a discussion, you must then change your role from the lead speaker to an active listener. The best way to ignite and power up a discussion is to ask questions and let people share their viewpoints. When you open up the floor for people to speak, they take ownership of the topic and the content only gets better from there. The quality of such discussions and communication is extremely high.

“Ask the right question, and the answer often reveals itself’ - Oprah Winfrey . Powerful questions unlock new insights, fresh perspectives and guide us towards effective decisions and solutions. Asking questions is the other side of the coin along with active listening. Both work in tandem to stimulate curiosity and generative thinking. Asking questions is also a way to challenge existing biases, beliefs and set patterns of thinking. They nudge and push you to discover your blind spots and explore possibilities which were hitherto not recognised.

A mi me ha resultado escuchar para complementar, debatir, completar o concretar ideas o absolver consultar si este fuera el caso. Es importante "NO escuchar para atacar" por el contrario debemos escuchar sin sesgos y tampoco tomarlo a modo personal. El carácter global, holistico, sano y profesional de una conversación lo determina la capacidad de escucha que seamos capaces de tener frente a nuestro interlocutor.

Effective communication extends beyond articulate speaking; it fundamentally involves active listening. Employ logical reasoning to formulate insightful questions that clarify and explore topics more deeply. Opt for open-ended questions that foster dialogue rather than making assumptions. This approach not only respects your colleagues' viewpoints but also encourages their participation, making them feel included in the conversation. It also provides you with the necessary information to craft well-reasoned responses.

A comunica??o eficaz é fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer organiza??o. No entanto, muitas vezes, a falta de clareza e a presen?a de falácias podem comprometer a transmiss?o de informa??es importantes. O raciocínio lógico surge como uma ferramenta poderosa para melhorar a comunica??o no local de trabalho, garantindo que as mensagens sejam claras, precisas e persuasivas. 2. Fa?a perguntas Fazer perguntas é uma técnica eficaz para envolver os interlocutores e esclarecer dúvidas. Perguntas bem formuladas estimulam o pensamento crítico e incentivam os colaboradores a refletirem sobre suas próprias posi??es e argumentos. Além disso, essa prática promove um ambiente de diálogo aberto e colaborativo.

A comunica??o eficaz é fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer organiza??o. No entanto, muitas vezes, a falta de clareza e a presen?a de falácias podem comprometer a transmiss?o de informa??es importantes. O raciocínio lógico surge como uma ferramenta poderosa para melhorar a comunica??o no local de trabalho, garantindo que as mensagens sejam claras, precisas e persuasivas. 3. Evite falácias As falácias s?o erros de raciocínio que podem distorcer a verdade e levar a conclus?es equivocadas. Identificar e evitar falácias comuns, como o ataque pessoal ou a generaliza??o apressada, é crucial para manter a integridade das discuss?es e garantir que as decis?es sejam baseadas em fatos e lógica sólida.

A healthy discussion is useful and it comprises from both challenging a point of view and defending one. It is really important to make sure that all parties in a discussion know that the "attack" on a point of view is not an attack on them personally, rather just a challenge that either strengthens the position or discovers gaps that haven't been though through. Open and honest communication should become part of companies culture. This is not always easy, however even just taking a pause mid discussion to explain and reiterate the point that the challenge is not personal helps.

Logical fallacies, which are mistakes in reasoning, can undermine your arguments. However, by recognizing and avoiding these errors, you can significantly enhance the quality of your discourse. It's beneficial to acquaint yourself with common fallacies like ad hominem attacks, where the focus is wrongly placed on discrediting the individual rather than addressing the argument itself, or false dilemmas, which inaccurately present situations as having only two possible outcomes when more options are available. By clearing these errors, you not only uphold intellectual integrity but also inspire a more reasoned and practical discourse.

Instead of assuming behaviors facts and motivations, why not simply ask? How many times has a colleague said oh I didn't think you wanted to go to lunch. Would you be more receptive to hey, we're going to lunch would you like to come? This is obviously a simple example but illustrates the point that assumptions can kill cooperative communication in the workplace.

Everything starts with trust. The best way to gain the trust of your audience or team is to reinforce your reasoning with strong and reliable evidence. Be honest about your viewpoint and don't try to change your stance to please people. Once people understand that you are authentic and your opinions are backed by evidence, they start respecting you and your thought process, even if they may not always be aligned to that. Differences in opinion may still exist, but the communication gets constructive.

Experience the satisfaction of facilitating informed decision-making by supporting your arguments with robust evidence. Utilizing data, specific examples, or expert opinions strengthens your points and enhances your persuasiveness. When you present evidence, ensure clarity regarding its source and its relevance to your argument. This practice not only boosts your credibility but also promotes a fact-based approach in discussions, facilitating more informed and adequate decision-making in the workplace.

A comunica??o eficaz é fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer organiza??o. No entanto, muitas vezes, a falta de clareza e a presen?a de falácias podem comprometer a transmiss?o de informa??es importantes. O raciocínio lógico surge como uma ferramenta poderosa para melhorar a comunica??o no local de trabalho, garantindo que as mensagens sejam claras, precisas e persuasivas. 4. Fornecer evidências Argumentos bem-sucedidos s?o apoiados por evidências concretas. Apresentar dados, exemplos e testemunhos relevantes fortalece a credibilidade do comunicador e facilita a compreens?o do público. A evidência n?o apenas suporta a argumenta??o, mas também demonstra o compromisso com a verdade e a transparência.

Providing evidence is important. However, to ensure that the receiver is more receptive.... first, start with providing evidence of positive behavior and then ask if you can provide feedback of negative behavior. If so, then present what happened, what the impact was and what your observation was. Then, allow your colleague to respond.

Foster Continuous Improvement through Feedback Establishing a feedback loop is vital for enhancing communication and sharpening logical reasoning skills. You can encourage your colleagues to share their insights on your ideas and stay tuned to revise your arguments based on new information or different perspectives. This approach underscores your commitment to logical reasoning and continual growth, a commitment that inspires and motivates. By actively seeking and valuing diverse viewpoints, you can refine your arguments, ensuring they are comprehensive, well-thought-out, and robust.

A comunica??o eficaz é fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer organiza??o. No entanto, muitas vezes, a falta de clareza e a presen?a de falácias podem comprometer a transmiss?o de informa??es importantes. O raciocínio lógico surge como uma ferramenta poderosa para melhorar a comunica??o no local de trabalho, garantindo que as mensagens sejam claras, precisas e persuasivas. O feedback é uma ferramenta valiosa para aprimorar a comunica??o. Incentivar os colegas a fornecerem suas opini?es e sugest?es cria um ambiente de aprendizado contínuo e melhoria. O feedback construtivo ajuda a identificar áreas de melhoria e a ajustar estratégias de comunica??o para atender melhor às necessidades da equipe.

The best way to encourage feedback is to model proper feedback yourself. If you truly want a feedback culture, this must start at the top. If you are a leader in your organization then you should model positive feedback behavior. Positive feedback behavior starts with trust in the communication which can only be done one on one, not in front of peers other bosses or anyone else in the organization. Second, can only occur if the person giving the feedback is calm and second of all if the person receiving feedback is in a receptive mood. So first, ask if you can give feedback. Accept that this might not be the right time and try again later if your colleague says no. When you give feedback again be factual state the impact and the effect.

As an HR Business Partner, I consider myself a ”leader whisperer” who provides feedback that can be given to the team, organization, or individuals, depending on the situation. Sometimes leaders are unsure about how honest their feedback should be or how to approach it in a sensitive and personal manner. In such cases, it’s beneficial to have a professional who specializes in feedback and uplifting others whisper in your ear: express respect, show care, and let them know you’re proud.

Be proactive in understanding and validating your understanding of your organisation’s culture. This is usually visible in how the strategy gets executed and helps you infer the prevailing logic and answers questions like: - Should I take more risk or less? - What are the critical factors to make a project succeed? - How can I add the most value to my team/business? - How do people get recognised around here? Making sure your logic aligns to the business is perhaps the most important success factor for your career :)

Being assertive and explain topics well does not mean that you cannot admit a few doubts too. Actually, simulating that you have 100% clarity when this is not the case, is counterproductive. Audience might conclude that either you are not fully transparent or that you have not reflected sufficiently. Be clear, also about your doubts!

If we are to communicate effectively we must first and foremost respect our audience. Respect their diversity. The different experiences and knowledge, cultural understanding and life lessons that people bring can hugely benefit the overall organisational decision making, but help make our work life much richer. Flexing our communication style to be able to relate to those whom we communicate with involves simple language to draw their attention and follow through action. Think about what is in it for them (more than what is in it for you). Taking another’s perspective and understanding and starting where they are at will help bring them along the journey.

I guess logic improves any conversation whether it is in the office, at home or anywhere else. Asking genuine questions is always good for any conversation, and above all listen carefully to the answers.

Being assertive and explain topics well does not mean that you cannot admit a few doubts too. Actually, simulating that you have 100% clarity when this is not the case, is counterproductive. Audience might conclude that either you are not fully transparent or that you have not reflected sufficiently. Be clear, also about your doubts!